November 5, 2007: This website is an archive of the former website,, which was created 10 years ago by Charles Jenks. It became one of the most populace sites in the US, and an important resource on the antiwar movement, student activism, 'depleted' uranium and other topics. Jenks authored virtually all of its web pages and multimedia content (photographs, audio, video, and pdf files. As the author and registered owner of that site, his purpose here is to preserve an important slice of the history of the grassroots peace movement in the US over the past decade. He is maintaining this historical archive as a service to the greater peace movement, and to the many friends of Traprock Peace Center. Blogs have been consolidated and the calendar has been archived for security reasons; all other links remain the same, and virtually all blog content remains intact.

THIS SITE NO LONGER REFLECTS THE CURRENT AND ONGOING WORK OF TRAPROCK PEACE CENTER, which has reorganized its board and moved to Greenfield, Mass. To contact Traprock Peace Center, call 413-773-7427 or visit its site. Charles Jenks is posting new material to, a multimedia blog and resource center.

Search site - New! Calendar - Calendar Archive
Contents - Archives - War Crimes - GI Special - Student Activism - Links

War on Truth  From Warriors to Resisters
Books of the Month

The War on Truth

From Warriors to Resisters

Army of None

Iraq: the Logic of Withdrawal

The following article is reprinted from the Indianapolis Stars.The copy of the article serves as a "fair use" for educational purposes. This website has no authority to grant permission to reprint this article. We reformat onto a separate web page because links to newspapers are unstable as stories are moved into the paper's archives.

Ex-U.N. arms inspector urges restraint on Iraq

Forum speaker says U.S. military action without world support would be disastrous.

 By Michael J. Rochon
August 22, 2002
A former United Nations chief weapons inspector said Wednesday that any premature military action taken against Iraq could spell doom for American troops.

Scott Ritter, the key speaker at a Downtown political forum sponsored by the Indianapolis Peace & Justice Center, said the Bush administration must temper all remarks about war against Iraqi president Saddam Hussein until other allied nations begin to show support.
"For us to take on Iraq right now would be a disaster," said Ritter, who was on a team of inspectors that in 1998 concluded the war-torn Middle-Eastern nation was no longer capable of producing weapons of mass destruction.

"If we were to go into Iraq right now, we would go in there alone -- as a rogue nation," he said. "And Iraq would fight back. They would lose . . . but they would fight."

Ritter made his comments to a crowd of about 300 at the Ashantii Ballroom, 1529 N. Alabama St.

Earlier in the day, President Bush and key military leaders met to discuss a potential military strike against Hussein's regime. Bush, however, promised from his Texas ranch to consult the allies before taking any such action.

Ritter, a former Marine, said he was not surprised by the president's pledge. He said the administration would have to prove Iraqi officials still have weapon-producing capabilities before other nations would join the fight.

"We've destroyed 95 percent of their (nuclear) factories, we've destroyed their weapons. How could they have such weapons if they all have been eliminated?" Ritter said. "Hussein is not a good guy, but we haven't proven that Iraq poses any threat to American security."

Also participating in the forum were members of the Hudson Institute, a local think tank.

Dr. Pierre Atlas, a political science professor at Marian College, acknowledged Hussein is an "evil man who leads a brutal and oppressive regime." But he also urged Bush to use caution.

"Waging war against Iraq could open a can of worms in the Middle East," Atlas said. "Would we achieve any of our goals if the (area) goes up in smoke?"

Meanwhile, audience members such as Turkish native Ali Selcuk said he appreciated the opportunity to discover new viewpoints on the topic. "We want to learn the truth about the situation in Iraq. We want to have as much information that is available."